<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techno matt &#187; opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technomatt.org/blog/tag/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technomatt.org/blog</link>
	<description>mind leakage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trancers: crap-tacular sci-fi</title>
		<link>http://technomatt.org/blog/2008/04/11/trancers-crap-tacular-sci-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://technomatt.org/blog/2008/04/11/trancers-crap-tacular-sci-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zebtron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horrible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microreview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technomatt.org/blog/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the makers of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098143/" target="_blank">&#8220;Puppet Master&#8221; </a>comes a movie that is even worse.  The acting is horrible, stunts laughable, effects cheesy, and acting abismal.  If that if your cup of tea, rent <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090192/" target="_blank">&#8220;Trancers&#8221;</a>.  I had not seen it until today and man do I wish I had not, but at least I now have the experience of seeing a seriously bad &#8216;USA network in the 1980&#8242;s&#8217; genre garbage-flic.  The budget was obviously less than that of an episode of MacGyver and the overall quality of the film/video was just junk.  Perhaps it was shot straight to video?  Anyway, here is a boom mic in one of the scenes&#8230; not even really an important few seconds that couldn&#8217;t have been dropped in the edit, but they let it in.  Super sloppy and lazy.<br />
<a title="trancers_boom by zebtron, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zebtron/2404507475/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3252/2404507475_d2ffa78fdc_m.jpg" alt="trancers_boom" width="240" height="180" /></a><br />
I almost want to remake this whole movie shot for shot as a parody.  I could surely do better effects and can borrow a scooter (they ride scooters around).</p>
<p>The DVD menu link that labeled &#8216;web site&#8217; plays a video of the mailing address and says &#8220;Send us a letter&#8221;&#8230; really?  Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technomatt.org/blog/2008/04/11/trancers-crap-tacular-sci-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC should extend license fees to N America</title>
		<link>http://technomatt.org/blog/2008/04/10/bbc-should-extend-license-fees-to-n-america/</link>
		<comments>http://technomatt.org/blog/2008/04/10/bbc-should-extend-license-fees-to-n-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zebtron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2dotoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPlayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technomatt.org/blog/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">It would make so much sense for the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk" target="_blank">BBC</a> to offer streaming television (IPTV) in N America.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">With the launch of the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/" target="_blank">BBC iPlayer</a>, we know the technology is already there.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk" target="_blank">BBC</a> has a huge opportunity to  make gigantic audience inroads.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Potentially, they would be able to sell N America the same programming without having to operate any physical terrestrial broadcast equipment.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Yes, they would most likely need to locate some additional server in the Americas, but the probable cost/viewer ration dropping for IP only TV, it should be a way to subsidize British TV using overseas funds.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">From best I can tell the annual fee for <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050303-4667.html" target="_blank">&#8220;residents of the UK pay £116.00 a year for a color TV license&#8221;.</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I think the biggest obstacle would be existing <a href="http://www.bbcamerica.com/" target="_blank">BBC America</a> deals with cable and satellite.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Come on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk" target="_blank">BBC</a>!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I want your content (<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk" target="_blank">Sky too</a>) but I don&#8217;t want nor need  US cable or satellite money grubbers in the middle.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Isn&#8217;t it 2008?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technomatt.org/blog/2008/04/10/bbc-should-extend-license-fees-to-n-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.536 seconds -->

